Test renders of new trees...Update 01-26
Re: Test renders of new trees...Update 01-10
Stu, thanks...and yeah, I see it too: while I admit to allowing the original png leaves to range up to about 7" (a bit big) I have scaled these trees back and forth until the one in the right foreground has leaves as big as 11" (plus that trunk is too small for that amount of follage). Will fix before offering, I promise :`)
EDIT: the live oak trunk may be a bit big as well...will check?
Kim, thanks again...I'm humbled.
EDIT: the live oak trunk may be a bit big as well...will check?
Kim, thanks again...I'm humbled.
Re: Test renders of new trees...Update 01-10
and you can clean the pool at autumn [fall] time...OK?
Re: Test renders of new trees...Update 01-10
Tom, those Oaks in those last images look really impressive!
Re: Test renders of new trees...Update 01-10
............more trees! amazing Tom.
-
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2009 12:35 pm
Re: Test renders of new trees...Update 01-10
Definitely going to add these to my library Tom! Wonderful stuff.
Re: Test renders of new trees...Update 01-10
Thanks, Guys...glad to know I'm on the right track.
Re: Test renders of new trees...Update 01-14
several sides of the 8's and 9's:
- Attachments
-
- tn_!render89a+.jpg (254.97 KiB) Viewed 10099 times
-
- tn_!render89b+.jpg (244.71 KiB) Viewed 10098 times
Re: Test renders of new trees...Update 01-14
the skies look strange.
can you please post a screenshot of your sky settings dialog?
can you please post a screenshot of your sky settings dialog?
Re: Test renders of new trees...Update 01-14
I agree, but I assume that it's because the sky is low res...Fletch wrote:the skies look strange.
Cheers
Kim Frederik
Twilight Render Support
“…Life is drawing without an eraser...”
Kim Frederik
Twilight Render Support
“…Life is drawing without an eraser...”
Re: Test renders of new trees...Update 01-14
Fletch, here are the settings (on the right, left is the image below...and I also took some green out of the file and added some blue for this last one :`) but I think Fredrick is closer to the point. This is one of your skys (1500 feet) but I fiddled with the file by jimmying the jpeg to pilfer the pixels then scourged the sky...wanted something more malignant.
I keep intending to go back and do a better job...thanks for reminding me.
I keep intending to go back and do a better job...thanks for reminding me.
- Attachments
-
- skyset1.jpg (121.86 KiB) Viewed 10032 times
-
- tn_!render89c+.jpg (261.8 KiB) Viewed 10033 times
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests